decision sent to author nature communicationsexchanging information in business communication

We only considered 83,256 (out of the 106,373) manuscripts for which the gender assigned to the corresponding authors name by Gender API had a confidence score of at least 80 and the gender was either male or female (the Gender Dataset, excluding transfers). The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.05, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. In order to test whether two variables were independent, we used Pearsons chi-square test of independence and referred to the classification in [21] to define the strength of association. making DBPR compulsory to accelerate data collection and remove potential bias against the review model. We have analysed a large dataset of submissions to 25 Nature journals over a period of 2years by review model and in dependence of characteristics of the corresponding author. Hathaway High School Staff, For Coupons, Giveaways, and Free Games to play with your family, distance between underground pull boxes fiber optic cable, richest instagram influencers non celebrity, big spring correctional center inmate search, rachael newsham and dan cohen relationship, giorno giovanna you will never reach the truth japanese, 34 eye opening photos of the great depression, Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra. This reply will be sent to the author of the Correspondence before publication. Your script could be better than the image of the journal. Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. In Review. The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, (But be sure all your coauthors agree to opt-in, too.) Cohen-Friendly association plot for Table5. Once all author information has been resolved and extraneous or incorrect information removed, the system will guide you to the Manuscript Information tab. . How Many Seats Are Premium Economy On Emirates A380?, Click here to download our quick reference guide to journal metrics. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. If you require assistance, please scroll down and use one of the contact options to get in touch. Yes In order to test whether the proportions in different groups were the same, we used the test of equal proportions in R (command prop.test). Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. Submission to Accept: the median time (in days) from the published submission date to the final editorial acceptance date. . (major revision)6 (revision)3 (Covid-19) 3. Whereas in the more conventional single-blind peer review (SBPR) model, the reviewers have knowledge of the authors identity and affiliations [1]; under DBPR, the identity and affiliations of the authors are hidden from the reviewers and vice versa. Which proportions of papers are accepted for publication under SBPR and DBPR? r/biology I buried a dead rat (killed by delayed rat poison or a neighbor's cat) in an iron barrel with soil on Sep 8. Corresponding author defined. Based on the Nature Communications Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.6 days to get the first editorial decision. 9.3 weeks. The study was designed to analyse the manuscripts submitted to Nature-branded journals publishing primary research between March 2015 (when the Nature-branded primary research journals introduced DBPR as an opt-in service) and February 2017. England Women's Football Captain, Corresponding author defined. 20000 characters with spaces), Research Articles (25000-40000 characters with spaces), . Every step is described and will let you know whether action is required. The study reported on here is the first one that focusses on Nature-branded journals, with the overall aim to investigate whether there is any implicit bias in peer review in these journals and ultimately understand whether DBPR is an effective measure in removing referee bias and improving the peer review of scientific literature. Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. IP-address: 40.77.167.199. In WeWork, the Delaware Court of Chancery found that the use of Sprint email accounts by Sprint employees doing WeWork-related work for SoftBank caused the communications between SoftBank and those individuals to lose the privilege that might otherwise have attached to them. Survey on open peer review: attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. 0000006193 00000 n 2002;17(8):34950. Figure1 shows a Cohen-Friendly association plot indicating deviations from independence of rows (countries) and columns (peer review model) in Table5. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Help us improve this article with your feedback. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. The original authors are given 10 days to respond. Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. How Many Seats Are Premium Economy On Emirates A380? manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. 0000006171 00000 n Moreover, the two models do not have to be exclusive;one could think of a DBPR stage followed by full public disclosure of reviewers and editors identities and reports. Comment on/see emerging science in full HTMLin both phone and desktop-friendly sizes, Find new discoveries with fully-indexed search, Gain insight into the peer review pipeline at participating journals, Authors original submitted version and all versions are released in real time as peer review progresses. We employed hypothesis testing techniques to test various hypotheses against the data. 2.2 The model of bounded rationality. Data are collected annually for full calendar years. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. 0000004388 00000 n 'Completed - Accept'. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Editors are always aware of the identity of the authors. Res Integr Peer Rev 3, 5 (2018). Ross-Hellauer T, Deppe A, Schmidt B. Another issue that hampered our study was the lack of complete records for each manuscript in the dataset in relation to gender, country, and institution of the corresponding author. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. It is calculated by multiplying the Eigenfactor Score by 0.01 and dividing by the number of articles in the journal, normalized as a fraction of all articles in all publications. 9 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 11 /H [ 1335 254 ] /L 93263 /E 83910 /N 2 /T 92966 >> endobj xref 9 45 0000000016 00000 n Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. There is a tiny but significant association between institution group and acceptance, which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. The gender (male, female, or NA) of the corresponding authors was determined from their first name using a third-party service (Gender API). Nature . botln botkyrka kommun. 0000011085 00000 n Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. 0000003551 00000 n In order to see whether the final decision outcome could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. All communication from submission to publication will be with the corresponding author. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. The motivation behind Nature Communications is to provide authors with more choice; both in terms of where they publish, and what access model they want for their papers.At present NPG does not provide a rapid publishing opportunity for authors with high-quality specialist work within the Nature branded titles. 0000055535 00000 n Nature. Research Integrity and Peer Review 4;N>0TjAWSI#|9aJs]PZYp M#M%,f-);k'\C/*('O2 X(^tL4[msd\5n9cIh(?J0yVg5[5(z,|j}(mLR:V#P/lAD~"jhQT H+}0Z3Nj>!76{7#FMxgiqyym qo=CFf.oA:+ 6hlXT?:SNMZ/|)wj 44X7^tkp+:LL4 0000047805 00000 n 0000002625 00000 n Peer review times vary per journal. 2022.6.13 Editor Decision Started. . Information for other options are available on our Springer Nature Transfer Desk page. The decision is sent to the author. One reviewer admitted the specific field wasn't in his/hers expertise. Here, we define the corresponding author as the author who is responsible for managing the submission process on the manuscript tracking system and for all correspondence with the editorial office prior to publication. a higher likelihood for rejection) for double-blind than single-blind papers (p value <0.001, df=1, Cramers V=0.112 for first decision; p value <0.001; df=1, Cramers V=0.082 for post-review decision). . So, in October 2018, we added a new option for you when you submit to select Springer Nature journals. Nature and Nature Communications are to follow in due course. 0000011063 00000 n The results were significant for all pairs: group 1 vs. group 2 (2=15.961, df=1, p value <0.001); group 2 vs. group 3 (2=7.1264, df=1, p value=0.0227); and group 1 vs. group 3 (2=37.304, df=1, p value <0.001). 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. If you need any assistance please contact us at Author Support, or contact the responsible editor for the journal. botln botkyrka kommun. The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i.e. BMcG collected the data from GRID and THE, processed the data, and conducted the statistical analysis. If that article is rejected, the journal name and public peer review timeline will be removed but the preprint and any versions of it, if any, will remain public. Table14 shows acceptance rate by institution group, regardless of review type. Renee Wever. Brief definitions for each of the metrics used to measure the influence of our journals are included below the journal metrics. Tomkins A, Zhang M, Heavlin WD. Download MP3 / 387 KB. The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. More specifically, the proportion of authors choosing DBPR is lower for higher ranking institution groups; in the uptake analysis by country, China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. Editorial contacts can be found by clicking on the "Help & support" button under the "For Authors" section of the journal's homepage as listed on SpringerLink Nature Portfolio Journals If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript . Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. Ben Glocker (an expert in machine learning for medical imaging, Imperial College London), Mirco Musolesi (a data science and digital health expert, University College London), Jonathan Richens (an expert in diagnostic machine learning models, Babylon Health) and Caroline Uhler (a computational biology expert, MIT) talked to Nature Communications about their research interests in causality . Needs Approval or Revision Needs Approval. Tregenza T. Gender bias in the refereeing process? palabras en latn con significados bonitos. A 3D accelerometer device and host-board (i.e., sensor node) were embedded in a case . Because we were unable to independently measure the quality of the manuscripts, this quality-dependent selection, if present, remains undetermined in our study. An analysis of the journal Behavioral Ecology, which switched to DBPR in 2001, found a significant interaction between gender and time, reflecting the higher number of female authors after 2001, but no significant interaction between gender and review type [11].

Humboldt Tn Funeral Home Obituaries, Boys' Baseball Cleats Wide, Rat Tail Radish Recipes, Akron Volleyball Roster, Articles D